How to Dispute a Chargeback with Burlington
Burlington's dispute channel depends on the charge: vendor compliance (VC) and freight (FRT) charges must be disputed through Burlington's Traverse Portal, while shortage and price debits (DMQ and DMC) are disputed by email. The deduction type is encoded in the case-ID prefix: DMQ<invoice> marks a quantity or shortage claim, and DMC<invoice> marks a price difference, discount, or substitution, a pricing debit rather than a compliance charge. CMQ and CMC are the matching reversals (CMQ reverses a DMQ shortage, CMC reverses a DMC price difference). The numeric part of the case ID is the invoice number, not the PO, so the claim PO is a prefix that must be resolved to the full ERP PO before any lookup runs. A Burlington shortage dispute is hard-gated on a carrier-signed bill of lading, or, for POE import warehouses, the ocean-container packing list; an unsigned BOL does not meet Burlington's evidence bar. Burlington is not an EDI 754 routing partner, so a missing 754 is never evidence. Burlington also requires a supplementary Excel packet on the dispute email.
Burlington publishes the deadline itself. Its Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026) states that all shortage disputes should be emailed to Vendor.Relations@Burlington.com within 6 months of check remittance, with backup documentation and a filled-out copy of Burlington's Shortage Dispute Form, which is available from Vendor Relations. The same manual sets the liability line a shortage dispute turns on: a trailer counted, loaded, and sealed by the shipper and delivered with the seal intact negates Burlington's and the carrier's liability for a carton shortage on the BOL, while a concealed shortage found at receipt leaves the vendor liable. It also names the only document Burlington will accept as delivery proof, a BOL signed or stamped by Burlington receivers.
At a glance
- Submission channel
- Traverse Portal for vendor compliance (VC) and freight (FRT) charges; email for shortage and price debits (DMQ and DMC)
- Portal or mailbox
- Traverse Portal for VC and FRT charges; email submission for DMQ and DMC debits, where the dispute email carries the default attachments plus Burlington's required supplementary Excel packet
- Case-ID / notice shape
- DMQ<invoice> for quantity or shortage, DMC<invoice> for a price difference, discount, or substitution (pricing); CMQ and CMC are the matching reversals. The numeric portion is the invoice number, and the claim PO is a prefix that resolves to the full ERP PO
- EDI partner
- Not an EDI 754 routing partner; compliance is proven on the EDI 940, 945, and 856 timeline
- Dispute window
- 6 months from check remittance for shortage disputes, per Burlington's Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026). Burlington states it researches and responds to shortage disputes within 60 business days
- Required dispute form
- Burlington's Shortage Dispute Form, available from Vendor Relations, must be filled out and attached to a shortage dispute email
- Proof of delivery
- The only acceptable proof of delivery is a BOL signed or stamped by Burlington receivers (Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual, May 2026)
- Banners covered
- Burlington
- Source
- Burlington Stores, Inc. Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual, May 2026, published at burlington.com/vendors/vendor-manual
Submission channel
Burlington vendor compliance (VC) and freight (FRT) charges must be disputed through Burlington's Traverse Portal, not by email. Shortage and price debits (DMQ and DMC) are filed by email, and Burlington requires its supplementary Excel packet attached alongside the default evidence set. Before any lookup, resolve the claim PO prefix to the full ERP PO, because the numeric part of the DMQ or DMC case ID is the invoice number rather than the PO. A compliance claim filed without a BOL generally still needs a packing list attached.
For DMQ shortage deductions Burlington publishes the address, the deadline, and the form. Its Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026) states: “The shortage dispute form is available from Vendor Relations. All shortage disputes should be emailed to Vendor.Relations@Burlington.com within 6 months of check remittance. Include any backup documentation and a filled-out copy of the Shortage Dispute Form.” Read the rest of that passage before you file, because it constrains how you batch: Burlington asks that all undisputed shortage claims be sent on one dispute form, and specifically instructs vendors not to accumulate shortage disputes on a monthly, quarterly, seasonal, or annual basis. Those two instructions are not in tension. One dispute form covers the claims you are filing at that moment; the prohibition is on holding claims back to file them in periodic batches. File as claims arise, each on the current form, rather than saving up a quarter's worth. Burlington states it researches and responds to shortage disputes within 60 business days.
Burlington's Traverse Portal at burl.traversesystems.com is described in the same manual as the vendor's access point for downloading check remittances, checking invoice status, and updating corporate contacts, with portal access requested from Vendor.Setup@Burlington.com. The remittance download matters to the deadline above: the check remittance date starts the 6-month clock, and the last page of the check remittance carries the detail behind each DMQ shortage debit.
Reason-code taxonomy at a glance
Burlington encodes the deduction type in the AP case-ID prefix, not in a numeric reason code. DMQ marks a shortage or quantity claim; DMC marks a price difference, discount, or substitution, a pricing debit rather than a compliance charge. CMQ is the reversal of a DMQ (a shortage reversal) and CMC is the reversal of a DMC (a price-difference reversal). Burlington's Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026) publishes these prefixes directly in its Accounts Payable terms, alongside AN (anticipation), CR (credit), LH (legal hold or charge), MD (markdown), PMDSE (wire payment), and R (received short, recall, RTV, or buyer's request). That prefix list is the taxonomy Burlington publishes. It does not publish a numbered fee or violation schedule in that manual.
Shortage / non-receipt
A Burlington shortage deduction is disputable when the carrier-signed BOL, or for POE import warehouses the ocean-container packing list, shows shipped units approximately equal to ordered and carries no “signed short” stamp. Accept the charge when the BOL is annotated “signed short” or delivered units fall below ordered; route to review when the BOL row is missing or the quantities are ambiguous, or when the POE packing list cannot be located. A signed BOL is non-negotiable for domestic-DC shortage disputes, and Burlington's Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026) is explicit about whose signature counts: “The only acceptable proof of delivery is a BOL signed/stamped by Burlington receivers.” The same manual places the deadline at 6 months from check remittance and requires Burlington's Shortage Dispute Form with the email. Required evidence: the carrier-signed BOL with driver signature, reconciled against PO quantity ordered and invoice billed quantity, with carton count, ship date, carrier, and warehouse code; for POE warehouses (POELA and POENJ), no per-PO BOL exists by design, so the freight-forwarder packing list or ocean-container list is the shipment proof instead.
Concealed shortage
Burlington defines a concealed shortage as a carton-count concept: cartons short on the pallet relative to the BOL carton count, discovered after receipt, not a unit-level test. Burlington's Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026) states the rule and the liability directly: “Burlington counts all cartons at the time of receipt in the distribution center. If a concealed shortage is determined (the total number of cartons on the pallet is less than the BOL number of cartons on the pallet) the shipper (vendor) is liable.”
The same manual publishes the condition that negates that liability, and it is the pivot a concealed-shortage dispute turns on: “A trailer which is counted, loaded, and sealed by the shipper and delivered to a Burlington distribution center with the seal intact negates Burlington or the carrier from liability in the event of a carton shortage on the BOL.” Read the two together. Default liability for a concealed carton shortage sits with the vendor, and it is the seal record, evidence that the vendor counted, loaded, and sealed the trailer and that Burlington received it with the seal intact, that moves the line. That is why the seal evidence is not a nice-to-have on these cases. Note the manual's related warning on how the BOL is written: if the vendor marks the BOL with pallet contents, the driver is only counting pallets, and Burlington states the carrier and Burlington are not liable for the carton count.
Burlington also fixes what counts as delivery proof: “The only acceptable proof of delivery is a BOL signed/stamped by Burlington receivers.” A driver's signature alone does not satisfy that sentence. Roy works these from the carton records and the shipment's seal evidence where they support the shipment, and routes the rest to human review. Required evidence: the carrier-signed BOL carton count, the shipper-sealed-trailer seal record, and the receiving / proof-of-delivery carton count signed or stamped by Burlington receivers.
Compliance (routing / ASN / labeling / late ship)
Burlington compliance chargebacks cover routing, ASN, labeling, and packing violations. For example, a late or missing EDI 856 ASN relative to physical pickup, or labeling non-conformance billed under the Vendor Compliance (VC) program. Burlington's Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026) does not publish a numbered fee or violation schedule, so no fee codes or penalty amounts are stated here. They are disputable when the EDI evidence (940, 945, and 856) shows the compliance element was met within the window; accept when the EDI confirms the violation; route to review for retailer-TMS-specific rules that have no EDI counterpart in the supplier's own system. Required evidence: the warehouse 940, the warehouse 945 (the strongest proof of the actual ship date), the ASN 856 (proof that the ship notice was transmitted), and the order audit trail for date changes or cancellations, with exact timestamps cited. Because Burlington does not send EDI 754 routing, a missing 754 must never be cited as evidence.
What evidence you need
- Carrier-signed bill of lading with driver signature, reconciled against PO quantity ordered and invoice billed quantity (carton count, ship date, carrier, warehouse code)
- Freight-forwarder or ocean-container packing list for POE import warehouses (POELA, POENJ), where no per-PO BOL exists
- Carrier-signed BOL carton count, the shipper-sealed-trailer seal record, and the receiving / proof-of-delivery carton count, for concealed-shortage disputes
- EDI 940, 945, and 856 timeline with exact timestamps, plus the order audit trail
- Burlington's supplementary Excel packet, required on the dispute email
- A filled-out copy of Burlington's Shortage Dispute Form, obtained from Vendor Relations, required on a DMQ shortage dispute email per the Domestic Vendor Partnership Manual (May 2026)
- The check remittance itself, whose last page carries the detail behind each DMQ shortage debit and whose date starts the 6-month dispute clock
How Roy disputes Burlington
Roy resolves the claim PO prefix to the full ERP PO, reads the deduction type from the DMQ or DMC case ID, and pulls the evidence that type requires. For a shortage it checks the carrier-signed BOL (or the POE packing list) and the signed-short stamp; for a concealed shortage it works from the BOL carton count and the sealed-trailer record; for a compliance claim it compares the 940, 945, and 856 timeline against the window. It never cites a missing EDI 754 as evidence, and it produces the email dispute packet with the default attachments plus Burlington's required supplementary Excel.
Roy's role is to match each Burlington deduction to the evidence that overturns it and file it in the right channel: the Traverse Portal for vendor compliance and freight charges, email for shortage and price debits.
Related retailers & next steps
Related email-channel retailers with a signed-BOL evidence gate: Bealls (its sister-sourcing retailer) and Dollar General. For the other large off-price players, see TJX and Ross Stores, neither of which publishes a dispute channel. See the Deduction Code Library for the DMQ, DMC, and VC compliance codes in detail.